🚧 Setup for 4.9

This commit is contained in:
tomit4 2026-06-14 15:26:14 -07:00
parent 4e2d8e105b
commit e6703ca90b
3 changed files with 295 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -1110,3 +1110,135 @@ does not divide $(2 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7 \cdot 11 \dots p) + 1$, which equals
$N$. Hence $N$ is divisible by $q$ and $N$ is not divisible by $q$, and we have
reached a contradiction. _[Therefore, the supposition is false and the theorem
is true.]_
---
Page 258
**Definition**
The total degree of a graph is the sum of the degrees of all the vertices of the
graph.
---
Page 259
**Theorem 4.9.1 The Handshake Theorem**
If $G$ is any graph, then the sum of the degrees of all the vertices of $G$
equals twice the number of edges of $G$. Specifically, if the vertices of $G$
are $v_1, v^2, \dots v_n$, where $n$ is a nonnegative integer, then
$$ \text{the total degree of } G = \text{deg}(v_1) + \text{deg}(v_2) + \dots + \text{deg}(v_n) $$
$$ = 2 \cdot (\text{the number of edges of } G) $$
**Proof:**
Let $G$ be a particular but arbitrarily chosen graph, and suppose that $G$ has
$n$ vertices $v_1, v_2, \dots v_n$ and $m$ edges, where $n$ is a positive
integer and $m$ is a nonnegative integer. We claim that each edge of $G$
contributes $2$ to the total degree of $G$. For suppose $e$ is an arbitrarily
chosen edge with endpoints $v_i$ and $v_j$. This edge contributes $1$ to the
degree of $v_i$ and $1$ to the degree of $v_j$. As shown below, this is true
even if $i = j$, because an edge that is a loop is counted twice in computing
the degree of the vertex on which it is incident.
(see Page 259)
Therefore, $e$ contributes $2$ to the total degree of $G$. Since $e$ was
arbitrarily chosen, this shows that _each_ edge of $G$ contributes $2$ to the
total degree of $G$. Thus
$$ \text{the total degree of } G = 2 \cdot (\text{the number of edges of } G) $$
---
Page 259
**Corollary 4.9.2**
The total degree of a graph is even.
**Proof:** By Theorem 4.9.1 the total degree of $G$ equals $2$ times the number
of edges of $G$, which is an integer, and so the total degree of $G$ is even.
---
Page 260
**Proposition 4.9.3**
In any graph there is an even number of vertices of odd degree.
**Proof:** Suppose $G$ is any graph, and suppose $G$ has $n$ vertices of odd
degree and $m$ vertices of even degree, where $n$ is a positive integer and $m$
is a nonnegative integer. _[We must show that $n$ is even.]_ Let $E$ be the sum
of the degrees of all the vertices of even degree, $O$ the sum of the degrees of
all the vertices of odd degree, and $T$ the total degree of $G$. If
$u_1, u_2, \dots, u_m$ are the vertices of even degree and
$v_1, v_2, \dots, v_n$ are the vertices of odd degree, then
$$ E = \text{deg}(u_1) + \text{deg}(u_2) + \dots + \text{deg}(u_m), $$
$$ O = \text{deg}(v_1) + \text{deg}(v_2) + \dots + \text{deg}(v_m), \text{ and} $$
$$ T = \text{deg}(u_1) + \dots + \text{deg}(u_m) + \text{deg}(v_1) + \dots + \text{deg}(v_n) = E + 0 $$
Now $T$, the total degree of $G$, is an even integer by Corollary 4.9.2. Also
$E$ is even since either $E$ is zero, which is even, or $E$ is a sum of even
numbers. Now since
$$ T = E + O $$
then
$$ O = T - E $$
Hence $O$ is a difference of two even integers, and so $O$ is even.
By assumption, $\text{deg}(v_i)$ is odd for every integer $i = 1, 2, \dots, n$.
Thus $O$, an even integer, is a sum of the $n$ odd integers
$\text{deg}(v_1), \text{deg}(v_2), \dots, \text{deg}(v_n)$. But if a sum of $n$
odd integers is even, then $n$ is even. Therefore, $n$ is even _[as was to be
shown]._
---
Page 262
**Definition and Notation**
A **simple graph** is a graph that does not have any loops or parallel edges. In
a simple graph, an edge with endpoints $v$ and $w$ is denoted $\{v, w\}$.
---
Page 263
**Definition**
Let $n$ be a positive integer. A **complete graph on $n$ vertices**, denoted
$K_n$, is a simple graph with $n$ vertices and exactly one edge connecting each
pair of distinct vertices.
---
Page 264
**Definition**
Let $m$ and $n$ be positive integers. A **complete bipartite graph on $(m, n)$
vertices**, denoted $K_{m, n}$, is a simple graph whose vertices are divided
into two distinct subsets, $V$ with $m$ vertices and $W$ with $n$ vertices, in
such a way that
1. every vertex of $K_{m, n}$ belongs to one of $V$ or $W$, but no vertex
belongs to both $V$ and $W$;
2. there is exactly one edge from each vertex of $V$ to each vertex of $W$;
3. there is no edge from any one vertex of $V$ to any other vertex of $V$;
4. there is no edge from any one vertex of $W$ to any other vertex of $W$.